Re: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-26 Thread Lares Moreau
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 12:36 -0600, Joe McCann wrote: > > For the record, the eds flag was > added as a default flag because every 3rd gnome user would file bugs or > complain via forums because they installed gnome, found no > evolution-data-server integration, and then be bummed when they had to

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-26 Thread Jakub Moc
26.12.2005, 22:21:14, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petteno wrote: > On Monday 26 December 2005 20:24, Jakub Moc wrote: >> exactly the same thing with motif - would >> someone explain why the heck do do we need this thing in make.defaults? > Because people emerges xpdf waiting for xpdf binary and they won't

Re: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-26 Thread Joe McCann
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 17:57 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: > eds - please, fix the ebuilds properly instead of throwing the thing on > everyone. This has already caused numerous invalid bugs with people > wondering why the heck portage wants to emerge gnome with USE="-gtk -gnome" > How do you suggest t

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-26 Thread Jakub Moc
26.12.2005, 18:07:45, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:57:17 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | alsa - this does not make most sense definitely, this horrible thing > | needs to die. > Why? On x86, alsa is the least broken sound system, and on x86, the > target for the

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning

2005-12-26 Thread Jakub Moc
26.12.2005, 16:35:33, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:09:57 -0500 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | the USE defaults are a bit INSANE... We need to get rid of some of > | this crap... > No, you just don't understand how they work. It's not an issue of > "is foo impo