On Saturday 19 November 2005 00:34, Jakub Moc wrote:
> +1 on this, and please don't touch bugzie aliases, there's enough mess as
> it is (postgresl herd - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; apache herd - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]) If you want to do something useful, then please check
> that you have
19.11.2005, 23:19:41, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 03:20:57PM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
>> I would have preferred that the people involved with this could
>> have directly asked infra if this would work for us. That's a simple
>> request that I did not see from these folks.
19.11.2005, 10:31:23, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Corey Shields wrote:
>>>Before deciding on such proposals, it might be also wise to consult infra
>>>people who'll have to implement and maintain such things, IMHO. And, how
>>>exactly will be people having multiple roles handled here - still missing
19.11.2005, 5:30:35, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
>> Testing ebuilds when keywording/marking stable is supposed to be
>> mandatory and such stuff does not belong into changelogs.
> Sorry, but that's a big no. People that add/remove keywords without
> making note in the Changelog deserve a massive
19.11.2005, 3:49:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:27:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | 19.11.2005, 3:07:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| >> Sure, recognise their contributions, by giving them credit in
| >> ChangeLogs.
> |
> | How exactly does testing stuff fit int
19.11.2005, 3:07:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Sure, recognise their contributions, by giving them credit in ChangeLogs.
How exactly does testing stuff fit into *changelogs*, have I missed something?
--
jakub
pgpd4At0gxKS4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
19.11.2005, 1:38:03, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Incidentally, the benefit is to make users who are actively helping Gentoo
> feel like they're part of the family. It was decided that a straight
> @gentoo.org address would be confusing, though, since most people associate
> those addresses with deve
19.11.2005, 1:07:40, Homer Parker wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 23:29 +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
>> There is no technical reason why any of this is necessary and it
>> doesn't
>> provide any tangible benefits that I can see. If a user really wants
>> to
>> know someone's role within the project,
19.11.2005, 0:58:29, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> My preference is that the subdomain chosen should succinctly reflect the role
> that arch testers serve. My personal preference would be to choose something
> like "aide", "helper", "assistant", or something similar. (Indeed, I'd have
> preferred "vol
19.11.2005, 0:29:24, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> What purpose does this serve? This would create all sorts of confusion.
> Right now, you can meet someone in IRC and make a reasonable assumption that
> their email address is @gentoo.org. This would confuse things
> horribly imo. What about people lik
10 matches
Mail list logo
