On Tuesday 29 November 2011 15:09:33 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib
> when necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no
> need to explicitly list zlib as part of the system target. so time to
> drop it.
this
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 21:14:49 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib
> > when necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no
> > need to explicitly list zl
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 21:14:49 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib
> > when necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no
> > need to explicitly list zl
On 11/29/2011 06:14 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib
>> when
>> necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no need to
>> explicitly list zlib as part o
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib when
> necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no need to
> explicitly list zlib as part of the system target. so time to drop it.
> -mike
I
