On Monday 12 February 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> Migration is from my experience painless. Even if detecting does not
> work, the mdadm.conf syntax is easier IMHO.
and the comments in mdadm.conf explain the most common cases pretty clearly
> However a nice little guide or doc on it, sh
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> Migration is from my experience painless. Even if detecting does not
> work, the mdadm.conf syntax is easier IMHO.
>
> However a nice little guide or doc on it, should cover and address most
> all user issues stemming from migration. If such a document does not
> al
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:13 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 12 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Then what is the migration path? You made it sound like copying the
> > file was the solution.
>
> if the default mdadm scan does not automatically detect their raid devices,
> then
On Monday 12 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Then what is the migration path? You made it sound like copying the
> file was the solution.
if the default mdadm scan does not automatically detect their raid devices,
then the user needs to manually define their raid devices in /etc/mdadm.c
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 08:58 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 12 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > If we're going to do this, should we do it before the 2007.0 snapshot,
> > so people don't have raidtools disappear out from under them on their
> > newly-installed system?
>
> it's a
On Monday 12 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> If we're going to do this, should we do it before the 2007.0 snapshot,
> so people don't have raidtools disappear out from under them on their
> newly-installed system?
it's already been done
> Also, is mdadm.conf 100% compatible with /etc/rai
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 23:39 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 10 February 2007, Mike Doty wrote:
> > Do we have documentation on howto migrate? Thats the big thing holding
> > me back(afaik, I have to backup, wipe the disks and then do mdadm and
> > restore)
>
> erm, no ... you dont need
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> anyone have a compelling reason for keeping raidtools anymore ? the mdadm
>> package replaces all the functionality of raidtools and is actively
>> maintained upstream
>>
>> ive kept it around mostly so people can transition to mdadm nicely but i
>> think
>> it's a
On Saturday 10 February 2007, Mike Doty wrote:
> Do we have documentation on howto migrate? Thats the big thing holding
> me back(afaik, I have to backup, wipe the disks and then do mdadm and
> restore)
erm, no ... you dont need to do anything remotely close to this
raidtools/mdadm are just user
Mike Frysinger wrote:
anyone have a compelling reason for keeping raidtools anymore ? the mdadm
package replaces all the functionality of raidtools and is actively
maintained upstream
ive kept it around mostly so people can transition to mdadm nicely but i think
it's about time we let it go
> ive kept it around mostly so people can transition to mdadm nicely but
> i think it's about time we let it go
+1
a gentle push in the right direction can only be a good thing.
> -mike
pgpDOE4KQxCUl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-10 03:15]:
> anyone have a compelling reason for keeping raidtools anymore ? the mdadm
> package replaces all the functionality of raidtools and is actively
> maintained upstream
>
> ive kept it around mostly so people can transition to mdadm nicely
12 matches
Mail list logo
