Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Dan Armak
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 17:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working > > on in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this > > stuff in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:45:40 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was attempting to be helpful and filter out valid packages from the > list. I could have been an ass and been like "Yo I think > package.mask is bloated go clean it" and not given a list at all, but > that is not very

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Marcelo Góes
On 1/24/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours. Entries in > package.mask should have a corresponding ebuild in the tree somewhere. > I'd like to see the number of entries chopped by a fair margin. I masked prelude stuff so that

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 15:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working > > on in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this > > stuff in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Alec Warner
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote: I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able to

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Alec Warner
Marius Mauch wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:24 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask entries were

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working on > in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this > stuff in the tree right now. So that has chopped the number of entries by a > fair margi

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Martin Ehmsen
Alec Warner wrote: Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours. It would probably be easier if you added the maintainer of each package to the list (it shouldn't be that difficult, but I'm not volunteering :-P). /Martin -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:24 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a > really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask > entries were really referen

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask cleanups

2006-01-24 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote: > I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a > really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask > entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able > to write a much better one