On Monday 10 July 2006 10:08, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten??
wrote:
> >> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
> >>> c is simpler. I like it.
> >>
> >> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metad
On Sunday 09 July 2006 19:17, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
We will use the alternative c) - as lu_zero and flameeyes suggested.
> c) Using media-tv as herd and [EMAIL PROTECTED] (project's mail-address) as
> maintainer.
Matthias
--
Matthias Schwarzott
Gentoo Developer
http://www.gentoo.org
pg
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
>> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>> c is simpler. I like it.
>> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to
>> tag and assigning to that even
On 7/10/06, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > c is simpler. I like it.
> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to
> ta
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 19:17:09 +0200
Matthias Schwarzott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As the situation now has changed I would like to discuss this one
> more. Since one week we (hd_brummy and me) have changed our Gentoo
> VDR Project
> (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/video/vdr/index.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > c is simpler. I like it.
> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to
> tag and assigning to that even when a particular maintainer
On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote:
> c is simpler. I like it.
Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to
tag and assigning to that even when a particular maintainer is listed.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> What do you think of that?
c is simpler. I like it.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi!
As the situation now has changed I would like to discuss this one more.
Since one week we (hd_brummy and me) have changed our Gentoo VDR Project
(http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/video/vdr/index.xml) to an official
subproject of desktop/video.
Now the situation is as follows:
Most pack
Simon Stelling wrote:
'Will it allow you to manage the vdr-related packages and it's bugs
s/it's/its/
*sigh*
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Ned Ludd wrote:
Whats wrong with the existing herd?
Maybe the question should rather be:
'Will it allow you to manage the vdr-related packages and it's bugs
easier and more efficient than before?'
media-tv seems like the right place.
I'd say that heavily depends on the answer of the quest
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:22 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I propose the creation of a new herd - "vdr".
>
> It will combine the program media-video/vdr, its plugins (87 plugins now in
> portage under media-plugins), some programs and some supplementary ebuilds
> (scripts ...).
Yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
