Re: [gentoo-dev] lastpipe

2012-05-25 Thread Dan Douglas
On Friday, May 25, 2012 08:52:00 PM Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 25 May 2012 18:33:43 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:02:32 -0500 Dan Douglas wrote: > > > If it were made a policy now that ebuilds and eclasses cannot depend > > > upon the subshell (for example, to set tempora

Re: [gentoo-dev] lastpipe

2012-05-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 25 May 2012 18:33:43 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:02:32 -0500 Dan Douglas wrote: > > If it were made a policy now that ebuilds and eclasses cannot depend > > upon the subshell (for example, to set temporary positional > > parameters or isolate temporary variables), then

Re: [gentoo-dev] lastpipe

2012-05-25 Thread Dan Douglas
On Friday, May 25, 2012 11:33:43 PM Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:02:32 -0500 > Dan Douglas wrote: > > If it were made a policy now that ebuilds and eclasses cannot depend > > upon the subshell (for example, to set temporary positional > > parameters or isolate temporary variable

Re: [gentoo-dev] lastpipe

2012-05-25 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:02:32 -0500 Dan Douglas wrote: > If it were made a policy now that ebuilds and eclasses cannot depend > upon the subshell (for example, to set temporary positional > parameters or isolate temporary variables), then maybe someday in the > distant future this could be made the