On Friday, May 25, 2012 08:52:00 PM Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2012 18:33:43 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:02:32 -0500 Dan Douglas wrote:
> > > If it were made a policy now that ebuilds and eclasses cannot depend
> > > upon the subshell (for example, to set tempora
On Friday 25 May 2012 18:33:43 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:02:32 -0500 Dan Douglas wrote:
> > If it were made a policy now that ebuilds and eclasses cannot depend
> > upon the subshell (for example, to set temporary positional
> > parameters or isolate temporary variables), then
On Friday, May 25, 2012 11:33:43 PM Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:02:32 -0500
> Dan Douglas wrote:
> > If it were made a policy now that ebuilds and eclasses cannot depend
> > upon the subshell (for example, to set temporary positional
> > parameters or isolate temporary variable
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:02:32 -0500
Dan Douglas wrote:
> If it were made a policy now that ebuilds and eclasses cannot depend
> upon the subshell (for example, to set temporary positional
> parameters or isolate temporary variables), then maybe someday in the
> distant future this could be made the