Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-11-04 Thread Doug Goldstein
Doug Goldstein wrote: > Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by > default? Especially after a long time of kerberos not having a > maintainer (thanks mueli for joining the Gentoo club and maintaining it > now). Our current maintainer is working his butt off to get it up

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:22 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: > >> Michael Hammer wrote: > >>> * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]: > If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. > >>> ++ > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Mart Raudsepp wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Michael Hammer wrote: * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]: If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. ++ I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely approve of nukin

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: > Michael Hammer wrote: > > * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]: > >> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. > > > > ++ > > I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely > approve of nuking

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Joe Peterson
Michael Hammer wrote: > * Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]: >> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. > > ++ I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely approve of nuking it. -Joe

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Michael Hammer
* Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081031 15:53]: > If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. ++ greets, mueli p.S.: thx for the suggestion cardoe! -- Michael Hammer|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Graz, AT Gent

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:41:26 Doug Goldstein wrote: > Dawid Węgliński wrote: > > On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> Marius Mauch wrote: > >>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 > >>> > >>> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Someone remind me again

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Doug Goldstein
Dawid Węgliński wrote: > On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> Marius Mauch wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 >>> >>> Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Dawid Węgliński
On Friday 31 of October 2008 19:17:45 Doug Goldstein wrote: > Marius Mauch wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 > > > > Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by > >> default? > > > > AFAIK it was added so that the d

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 > Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by >> default? > > AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Doug Goldstein
Marius Mauch wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 > Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by >> default? >> > > AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for > joining a Windows domain

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Marius Mauch
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400 Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by > default? AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for joining a Windows domain (same for the ldap flag). > If no one oppose