Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Friday 06 July 2007 06:08:43 Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike As Adam already pointed/asked earlier, are we going to see Kevin's work being merge

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Mike Frysinger wrote: get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 in the next day or so -mike FYI, seems one of the R10K patches fails for mips after all (compile failure below). Probably a define that shifted and I

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Luca Barbato wrote: > gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? > > I'll give a test on ppc* soonish. I've been using it on x86 and ppc32 (ibook g4) for a week or two with no issues. Thanks, Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so Will we see the hardened gcc-4 patchset included in this? --atj --

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks ema

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike - From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use gli

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Friday 06 July 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > Why 4.2.0 rather than 4

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are all import

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: >>> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 >>> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 >>> in the next day or so >> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? > > I'll

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 00:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so Been using it for a few weeks on ~x86-fbsd without issue now. Any chance you could add a

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike -DRAC-WAS-HERE == -O4 now? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Luca Barbato wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 in the next day or so -mike gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? I see they got around to adding the -fno-

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Friday, 6. July 2007 10:09, Petteri Räty wrote: > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > -mike > > About how many packages will break with the ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? I'll give a test on ppc* soonish. lu -- Luca Barbato

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Friday, 6. July 2007, Petteri Räty Ви написали: > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course > switch not used by default so that's ok. If this mak

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course switch not used by default so that's ok.

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Friday 06 July 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so sorry, forgot about ~ia64 as well -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mess

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote: > > > Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump? > > no And there was great rejoicing. -- Jim Ramsay Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump? no -mi

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch

Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump? -- Jim Ramsay Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) signa