Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 12 December 2011 17:47:54 Francesco Riosa wrote: > not there yet, I was looking for this: > > git clone https://github.com/hjl-tools/linux.git > git checkout hjl/x32/lfs/v3.1 sorry, i didn't realize that's what you were looking for. i mentioned it in the summary which is a parent of t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-12 Thread Francesco Riosa
2011/12/12 Mike Frysinger : > On Monday 12 December 2011 09:47:44 Francesco Riosa wrote: >> 2011/12/11 Mike Frysinger : >> > On Saturday 10 December 2011 20:36:52 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: >> >> Mike Gilbert schrieb: >> >> > I think it is around 2.2 GB on amd64 with debug stuff (-ggdb). U

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 12 December 2011 09:47:44 Francesco Riosa wrote: > 2011/12/11 Mike Frysinger : > > On Saturday 10 December 2011 20:36:52 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > >> Mike Gilbert schrieb: > >> > I think it is around 2.2 GB on amd64 with debug stuff (-ggdb). Under > >> > half that without the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-12 Thread Francesco Riosa
2011/12/11 Mike Frysinger : > On Saturday 10 December 2011 20:36:52 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: >> Mike Gilbert schrieb: >> > I think it is around 2.2 GB on amd64 with debug stuff (-ggdb). Under >> > half that without the debug. >> > >> > I'm pretty sure there gentoo users on x86 that are a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 10 December 2011 20:36:52 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Mike Gilbert schrieb: > > I think it is around 2.2 GB on amd64 with debug stuff (-ggdb). Under > > half that without the debug. > > > > I'm pretty sure there gentoo users on x86 that are able to build it; > > it does have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Mike Gilbert schrieb: > I think it is around 2.2 GB on amd64 with debug stuff (-ggdb). Under > half that without the debug. > > I'm pretty sure there gentoo users on x86 that are able to build it; > it does have an x86 keyword afterall. :) Some people mess with kernel/user memory split to avoid H

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: >>> Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: >>> >  - x32 is the default ABI >>> >>> Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB ba

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 10 December 2011 14:36:25 Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: > >> Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: > >> > - x32 is the default ABI > >> > >> Given that it's relatively easy to hit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: >> Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: >> >  - x32 is the default ABI >> >> Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB barrier in the >> toolchain (e.g. Firefox LTO build), wouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-12-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 10 December 2011 08:15:10 octoploid wrote: > Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: > > - x32 is the default ABI > > Given that it's relatively easy to hit the 4GB barrier in the > toolchain (e.g. Firefox LTO build), wouldn't it make sense to > build gcc, binutils, et.al. as 64-bit LSB e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants

2011-09-16 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, September 16, 2011 01:46:49 Duncan wrote: > Mike Frysinger posted on Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:18:43 -0400 as excerpted: > > On Thursday, September 15, 2011 17:03:07 Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:33:48 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > On Thursday, September 15, 2011 16:12:0