On Friday 25 May 2012 12:06:49 Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> Mike Frysinger писал 2012-05-25 19:42:
> > On Thursday 24 May 2012 23:47:23 Ryan Hill wrote:
> >> Is there any sane way to handle sub-eclasses? eg. foo-base inherits
> >> foo-functions.
> >
> > i was thinking of extending the metadata to han
Mike Frysinger писал 2012-05-25 19:42:
On Thursday 24 May 2012 23:47:23 Ryan Hill wrote:
Is there any sane way to handle sub-eclasses? eg. foo-base inherits
foo-functions.
i was thinking of extending the metadata to handle this. did you
have any
specific ideas in mind ? i can see inheriti
On Thursday 24 May 2012 23:47:23 Ryan Hill wrote:
> Is there any sane way to handle sub-eclasses? eg. foo-base inherits
> foo-functions.
i was thinking of extending the metadata to handle this. did you have any
specific ideas in mind ? i can see inheriting say distutils should not require
peo
On Thursday 24 May 2012 18:16:23 Steven J Long wrote:
> You could maybe tighten the false-negative side by scanning all functions
> defined in an eclass, and warning if they're undocumented.
that happens now when you emerge eclass-manpages, but i suspect no one cares.
if you run the script by ha
