On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:43:20 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
> > Incidentally, if anyone is still thinking that built_with_use is
> > fine... It doesn't handle IUSE defaults, which means package
> > managers have to store a hacked version of IUSE in VDB fo
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
Incidentally, if anyone is still thinking that built_with_use is
fine... It doesn't handle IUSE defaults, which means package managers
have to store a hacked version of IUSE in VDB for EAPI 1. This isn't
documented anywhere and is highly unobvious.
I don't understan
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:43:55 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This will let package managers use a format other than VDB. A well
> > designed replacement can shave a minute off cold cache command
> > times.
>
> How much gain can be expected?
There're two common operations
