On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:30:37AM +0300, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> but i think linus is too biased against other scms...
He is biased against technical choices done in other SCMs, which is
not exactly the main thing. Specifically, from what I can see, he
hates:
- centralization (cvs, svn...)
O/H Marijn Schouten (hkBst) έγραψε:
> There seemed to be still some doubt as to the benefits of distributed
> SCMs.
> Fortunately Linus himself, at a talk at Google a few weeks back,
> explained the
> benefits of being distributed and said fun and interesting things
> about git
> and other source c
On 6/3/07, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Linus is biased towards the Linux development model, which is highly
> atypical.
Better said as "git is pretty good for developing linux", would it fit
our needs?
The only problem I see is getting a good documentation a
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Linus is biased towards the Linux development model, which is highly
> atypical.
Better said as "git is pretty good for developing linux", would it fit
our needs?
The only problem I see is getting a good documentation about using git
sourcemage[1] made something nice even
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:00:44 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seemed to be still some doubt as to the benefits of distributed
> SCMs. Fortunately Linus himself, at a talk at Google a few weeks
> back, explained the benefits of being distributed and said fun and
> i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There seemed to be still some doubt as to the benefits of distributed SCMs.
Fortunately Linus himself, at a talk at Google a few weeks back, explained the
benefits of being distributed and said fun and interesting things about git
and other source code
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 19:30 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> I just don't think it is obvious what tests should be performed. Furthermore
> the difference between
> the different systems is not just performance, but also features. So we need
> to discuss what
> standards any candidate SCM
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:30:29 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore I'd like to
> know what architectures need to be supported by a candidate SCM.
Oh that's an easy one.
All arches that Gentoo supports.
Also it needs to support FreeBSD :)
Thanks
Roy
--
gentoo-d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 11:52 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> So in light of all that I don't think it is wasteful to restart this
>> discussion.
>
> I do.
>
> Want to bring it back up? Go perform some tests and repo
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 11:52 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> So in light of all that I don't think it is wasteful to restart this
> discussion.
I do.
Want to bring it back up? Go perform some tests and report back with
some data if you feel prior efforts weren't done properly or
reproduc
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:58:59 -0400
>> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Please, everyone, go back and read the actual *facts* that were
>>> discovered using copies of *our* repositories before going arou
11 matches
Mail list logo
