Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-03-10 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > >  Having the EAPI stored outside the ebuild's scope is generally a bad > idea, because someone has to tell you that the ebuild you just > downloaded from Bugzilla is EAPI x.  And the package manager will be > totally confused when ass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-03-09 Thread Richard Freeman
Duncan wrote: So putting it in the manifest but generated from the ebuild info really doesn't change the problem, leaving us precisely where we were before, except that it may be useful as a component of one of the other solutions, and has been proposed as such in a few of the suggested varian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-03-02 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Montag, den 02.03.2009, 08:31 +0100 schrieb Christian Faulhammer: > Hi, > > Petteri Räty : > > > Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many > > people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order > > to get some idea what the general developer pool th