On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:39:52 -0400 as excerpted:
>
>> i thought there was talk of an automatic @security set at some point,
>> but not sure if that got anywhere.
Marius (genone) added @security support
On 10/12/2011 08:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 October 2011 11:09:56 Zac Medico wrote:
>> How about if we add a `emerge --upgrade` target that is analogous to
>> `apt-get upgrade`?
>
> isn't that already done with @installed ? `emerge --upgrade @installed`
At this time, @install
On Thursday 13 October 2011 01:33:07 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:20:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 October 2011 11:09:56 Zac Medico wrote:
> > > How about if we add a `emerge --upgrade` target that is analogous to
> > > `apt-get upgrade`?
> >
> > isn't that alr
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:20:23 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 October 2011 11:09:56 Zac Medico wrote:
> > How about if we add a `emerge --upgrade` target that is analogous to
> > `apt-get upgrade`?
>
> isn't that already done with @installed ? `emerge --upgrade
> @installed` -mike
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 23:26:28 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 October 2011 11:09:56 Zac Medico wrote:
> >> How about if we add a `emerge --upgrade` target that is analogous to
> >> `apt-get upgrade`?
> >
> > isn't that alre
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 October 2011 11:09:56 Zac Medico wrote:
>> How about if we add a `emerge --upgrade` target that is analogous to
>> `apt-get upgrade`?
>
> isn't that already done with @installed ? `emerge --upgrade @installed`
Well, you'd
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 11:09:56 Zac Medico wrote:
> How about if we add a `emerge --upgrade` target that is analogous to
> `apt-get upgrade`?
isn't that already done with @installed ? `emerge --upgrade @installed`
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> How about if we add a `emerge --upgrade` target that is analogous to
> `apt-get upgrade`? If we hide the new defaults behind a target like
> --upgrade, rather than change the defaults globally, then it allows
> people's existing scripted and ha
On 10/12/2011 07:10 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> That leads me to another concern. The defaults should be the safe
> options, and the options should be to make the actions less safe.
>
> In my thinking the most conservative options right now are either
> emerge -uDN world or emerge -uDN --with-bdeps
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> That's probably why there's no mention in the docs other than the portage
> manpage. Now that we have swift back, he's applying some much needed
> attention to the docs tree and its coming back into shape. =:^)
I definitely a
10 matches
Mail list logo
