* Alex Alexander schrieb am 22.07.11 um 13:30 Uhr:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
> >> Hi devs,
> >> I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
> >> packages and uses it's own eclas
2011/7/22 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn :
> But I do think it is
> good to have live ebuilds in portage, especially for fast moving
> applications.
I think they can be useful for any application as long as they're
maintained. I can see the value of the QA policy that they must be
masked, but I don
Maxim Koltsov schrieb:
> Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
> leechcraft-plugins) to simplify managing leechcraft ebuilds. And the
> last question: is it good to add versions for all ebuilds too?
>
I don't think there is a need for a new category. But I do think it
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
>> Hi devs,
>> I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
>> packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
>> commit it to the tree.
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
> Hi devs,
> I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
> packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
> commit it to the tree.
> Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
