On 03/31/10 16:28, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
I am worried that if people start using say Google Docs for
collaborating on Gentoo content, everyone else is forced to use Google
Docs to participate.
While I do appreciate projects like TechTalks and Summer of Code I
personally do not trust Google wi
On 04/01/10 02:44, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the rest of your gentoo-dev vs gentoo-core logic has been addressed by
> Brian/Jorge -- this is the internet, you have no privacy, get over it.
privacy is not black and white. i'm aware there's no leak-free zone.
i have put my point clear before, if tha
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 19:49:15 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 04/01/10 01:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > no one is forcing you to, nor is anyone talking about having teams use
> > it. if Gentoo developers themselves choose to, it's going to happen
> > irregardless of what Alec is proposing.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-03-2010 23:49, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 04/01/10 01:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> your logic does not lead to the statement that gentoo-core is the
>> appropriate
>> place.
>
> point takes, it's not the non-technical nature - i should put
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 01:49:15AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> point takes, it's not the non-technical nature - i should put it
> clearer: it's the fact that everyone on the net will be able to read
> what anyone said on google in this thread. any one of us may change his
> mind on that but
On 04/01/10 01:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> no one is forcing you to, nor is anyone talking about having teams use it.
> if
> Gentoo developers themselves choose to, it's going to happen irregardless of
> what Alec is proposing.
we are talking about public, shared work on gentoo - not about stu
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 17:33:17 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 03/31/10 23:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:28:15 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> >> To be very clear: Please take my vote against increasing dependencies on
> >> Google.
> >
> > so dont use it
> >
> >> On a
On 03/31/10 23:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:28:15 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>> To be very clear: Please take my vote against increasing dependencies on
>> Google.
>
> so dont use it
>
>> On a side note: This is not a technical discussion only.
>> As such please use gen
On 03/31/2010 02:28 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> I am worried that if people start using say Google Docs for
> collaborating on Gentoo content, everyone else is forced to use Google
> Docs to participate.
Gentoo could set policies that such shared resources should not be done
via google calender
On 03/31/2010 01:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> Those, like me, who have several google apps accounts (I have a personal
>> business one, a personal one, and a work one) can keep accounts separate
>> this way. Also, since it's the "gentoo.org" google apps account, the
>> email address looks the s
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:28:15 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> To be very clear: Please take my vote against increasing dependencies on
> Google.
so dont use it
> On a side note: This is not a technical discussion only.
> As such please use gentoo-core for this next time. Thanks.
incorrect ...
Hello,
On 03/31/10 07:28, Alec Warner wrote:
> Currently a number of developers have engaged Google Apps Team Edition
> for gentoo.org. However Team Edition does not come with gmail and a
> subset of Team Edition users would like to host their gentoo.org mail
> on gmail.
> Activating Standard Ed
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:11:30 Joe Peterson wrote:
> It's a "Google Apps" account, not just a Gmail account. You cannot have
> more than one gmail account open in your browser at one time - the
> cookies are not separate. Whereas you *can* have your gmail and all of
> your google apps accoun
On 03/31/2010 02:18 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i'm already using ~/.forward which means mail still goes to mail.g.o and that
> server takes care of forwarding it to my private gmail.com account. then my
> mail client fetches it from gmail.com via the normal pop/imap methods. there
> is no nee
On 31 March 2010 07:28, Alec Warner wrote:
> This thread is primarily engaged in gauging interest in such a setup.
> Please reply if you are interested (or go vote on the bug.)
I am definitely interested.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux Qt project lead developer
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 02:24:24 Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 01:28:56 Alec Warner wrote:
> >> Currently a number of developers have engaged Google Apps Team Edition
> >> for gentoo.org. However Team Edition does not
Brian suggested I give more details, so here is more information ;)
23:36 < ferringb> antarus: why are we getting it for free offhand?
23:36 < ferringb> well, getting this moreso
23:37 < ferringb> (yes, I will look a gift horse in the mouth- it can
quickly become a cash-sinkhole if the horse hasn'
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 01:28:56 Alec Warner wrote:
>> Currently a number of developers have engaged Google Apps Team Edition
>> for gentoo.org. However Team Edition does not come with gmail and a
>> subset of Team Edition users would l
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 01:28:56 Alec Warner wrote:
> Currently a number of developers have engaged Google Apps Team Edition
> for gentoo.org. However Team Edition does not come with gmail and a
> subset of Team Edition users would like to host their gentoo.org mail
> on gmail.
> Activating Sta
19 matches
Mail list logo
