Denis Dupeyron schrieb:
> The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
> us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
> is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix.
> You can find threads about those at:
> http://archives.gent
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2009-11-30, 12:30):
> Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50):
>
> > The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
> > us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
> > is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation
Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50):
> The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
> us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
> is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix.
> You can find threads about those at:
> h
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:46:49PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:33:03 -0800
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > > "Provide proof that all existing and future caches that would rely
> > > upon this validation mechanism are functions purely and exclusively
> > > dependent upon the V
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:33:03 -0800
Brian Harring wrote:
> > "Provide proof that all existing and future caches that would rely
> > upon this validation mechanism are functions purely and exclusively
> > dependent upon the VDB content, and I shall be happy to make the
> > change."
>
> First I've s
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:31:17PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:34:38 -0800
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > I'd like
> > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6b3e00049a1bf35fbf7a5e66d1449553.xml
> > to be discussed, specifically zacs form of forced mtime updating of
> >
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:34:38 -0800
Brian Harring wrote:
> I'd like
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6b3e00049a1bf35fbf7a5e66d1449553.xml
> to be discussed, specifically zacs form of forced mtime updating of
> /var/db/pkg on vdb modifications
I've still not had an answer to:
"Provide
Brian Harring wrote:
> At this point, pkgcore/portage both have it implemented. Not sure if
> portage has released it yet, but >=pkgcore-0.5.2 is in the tree w/
> said updating support.
It's in >=portage-2.1.7.2 (and 2.1.7.x should be going stable in a
month or so).
--
Thanks,
Zac
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:50:22PM -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
> us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
> is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix.
> You can find thread
