On Wednesday 13 September 2006 03:19, Jason Wever wrote:
> You appear to be violating the license by considering anyone else's
> opinion but your own :-P
I never said I will consider other opinions anyway ;) But you're probably
right.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 02:37, Peter Gordon wrote:
> The "DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT" license is apparently a perfectly valid
> (though amusing) Free software license, according to an old post [1] on the
> debian-legal list.
I never intended otherwise, but better safe than sorry, I'd rather c
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:16:19 +0200
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If nobody has a problem with this next evening (UTC+2), I'll commit
> libcaca-0.99 under p.mask and this license to the licenses directory.
You appear to be violating the license by considering anyone els
Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
> So, I was working on updating libcaca to 0.99_bea4 version, but there's a new
> license to add, and I'd liek to know if anybody has a problem with this ...
>
> http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/
>
> --
Diego,
The "DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT" license is apparently a perf
