On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:43:21PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> Seems, I've been speaking to the wrong people then. Anyways, this has
> prompted loads of bugs being fixed, which might mean apache will go stable
> instead.
Could you please see about a definitive list of bugs that are solely
du
On Thursday 21 Apr 2005 12:37, Paul Varner wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:48 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> > I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff
> > (anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new
> > install layout) be package.mask'd due
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:48 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff
> (anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new install
> layout) be package.mask'd due to the regressions and breakages in testing. I
> may
