Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 4 May 2011 14:09:03 +0300 Kfir Lavi wrote: > > Maybe we should add a new USE flag that will install just the > > libraries. > > (USE="justlibs") Then you'd have to update nearly every package that deps upon GCC to have a [-justlibs] dependency. Arguably not so bad for GCC, but in general

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-04 Thread Kfir Lavi
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:53 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." > wrote: > > On 5/3/11 5:27 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > >> In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or > glibc. > > > > See > > < > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-co

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-03 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:53 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 5/3/11 5:27 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: >> In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or glibc. > > See > > >> Why sys-d

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACE gcc and libc dependency

2011-05-03 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 5/3/11 5:27 PM, Kfir Lavi wrote: > In the ebuild there is no mention of runtime dependency like gcc or glibc. See > Why sys-devel/gcc don't have a library version without the actual compiler? Thi