On 2007.07.13 18:12, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 08:34 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > We're voting on this next council meeting so if you have input,
> now
> > > would be the time.
> >
> > Really, I don't like the idea...the li
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:11:19 Duncan wrote:
> Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>
> excerpted below, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:01:53 -0600:
> > Why don't we create the gentoo-project mailing
> > list, and, you know, actually wait a bit to see how that actually goes.
> > Then we
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:22:09AM +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
> What will you do when users start sending mail from dev addresses?
Ban the sender's address :-]
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
forum-mods (at) ge
Torsten Veller wrote:
* Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where only
devs can post, but any dev could moderate a non-dev post.
What will you do when users start sending mail from dev addresses?
There's nothing to prevent that n
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 13:34 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Are you really claiming that Gentoo could possibly function as an
> organisation without the users?
Who ever said that?
Please don't read your own whatever into what is being said. I know I,
for one, don't really care what your opinion is on
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:49:23 +0200, "Jakub Moc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> __ __ _
> |__ / _ \| \/ |/ ___| |
> / / | | | |\/| | | _| |
> / /| |_| | | | | |_| |_|
> /\___/|_| |_|\(_)
>
> Anyone tell me how can I get rid of this junk in my mailbox? Where's the
> d
__ __ _
|__ / _ \| \/ |/ ___| |
/ / | | | |\/| | | _| |
/ /| |_| | | | | |_| |_|
/\___/|_| |_|\(_)
Anyone tell me how can I get rid of this junk in my mailbox? Where's the
damned -announce list? Please, stop feeding this kind of debates down
everyone's throat.
:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:34:31 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It also happens that bugs are reported, and patches provided, by
> users. Not to mention documentation written, support provided on irc
> and in forums, which are the envy of every OS out there. Oh and the
> small matter of
Hello Steve!
On Monday, 16. July 2007 18:17:00 Steve Long wrote:
> Sure, but since you're only doing exactly what you want, when you want,
> why do you guys keep bleating about how much work you have, and what
> extravagant demands us lusers make on you?
Now, now. You're a nice guy on IRC so what
Steve Long wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>
>> Matthias Langer wrote:
>>
>>> no offense, but this is one of the worst proposals i've ever read on
>>> this list; why? because, one of gentoo's major problems is that it is
>>> becoming more and more a toy exclusively for its own developers.
Duncan wrote:
I like the "gentoo-project" (yes, that's better than politics) idea as
well, and believe it /could/ solve the problem here, given a couple
conditions are met.
One, -project is not to be required reading for devs as -dev is. Devs
(and others) can ignore it if they wish.
Two,
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:16:36 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christina Fullam wrote:
> > I think everyone is overlooking the part included previously:
> > "An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on a
> > timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 10:25 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> > -core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
> > -core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
>
> No. -core should not ever be public. It's not for
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> -core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
> -core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
No. -core should not ever be public. It's not for development anyway.
-core contains things like personal issues the developer
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 10:16 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > so all
> you've done is made posts from non-dev accounts time delayed. Why?
Time delayed -dev doesn't make sense for anyone. IMHO this makes sense.
-core Internal Private List, Public R/O after period of time
-devInter
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:12:27 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am so waiting for my term to end on the Council so I can procmail
> this list to /dev/null and never have to deal with this sort of crap
> again. Sure, I'll miss some important information, but the signal to
> noise
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 08:34 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > We're voting on this next council meeting so if you have input, now
> > would be the time.
>
> Really, I don't like the idea...the list has been calm for some time
> now, the discussions were le
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 00:55 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Mike Doty wrote:
> > We're going to change the -dev mailing list from completely open to where
> > only devs can post,
>
> Restricting freedom to post is like setting up surveilance and censorship
> against terrorism.
No, it is nothing
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Let's go for censorship! Let's vote for gagging those users who don't
> have any idea of development and those ex-devs who think they still have
> anything to say.
Yawn...
>
> And to give that comment a technical side:
> - Do you think that any dev will regularly check fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
