Mint Shows wrote:
This feature should only be used for things that are directly related
to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored.
I fully agree with this statement. I am behind the adoption of the
GLEP only if it does what (I originally believed) was its purpose...to
g
This feature should only be used for things that are directly related
to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored.I
fully agree with this statement. I am behind the adoption of the
GLEP only if it does what (I originally believed) was its purpose...to
get CRITICAL news regarding package u
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 04:32 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> I agree to some extent with both viewpoints, here. I think the viewpoint
> of the "portage first" side is that we already have the "traditional"
> stuff, the announce and dev list, the GWN, the forums, and "system
> changing" announcements general
maillog: 11/11/2005-05:48:50(-0700): Duncan types
> Perhaps $PORTDIR/news, with seen and unseen subdirs (and appropriate
> no-sync settings on the subdirs)
Remember that $PORTDIR can be shared between machines. That's why
"world" is kept in /var/lib/portage.
--
\Georgi Georgiev \ Ignoranc
On Sunday 06 November 2005 13:38, Duncan wrote:
> I don't believe the apache upgrade issues were announced on the announce
> list.
For the record, it was sent to the announce list on 2004-12-24.
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gentoo-announce] Apache packages refresh on 8th January 20
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:38:47 -0700 Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| While I agree with the point you make, I don't believe the apache
| upgrade issues were announced on the announce list. The news in the
| tree thing is a good idea, IMO, but it'll take some time to
| implement. "Earth changing
