Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-06-02 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 17:43 +, Sven wrote: > (1) > All gems should be installed from ebuilds only. > > (2) > If an ebuild requires a gem, it has to be installed from the corresponding > ebuild. For all other gems, Gentoo leaves the choice to the user and tries to > work together as well as po

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-17 Thread Petteri Räty
Sven wrote: > Gilles Dartiguelongue gentoo.org> writes: so this wrapper could be installed in a separate eselect sort of package ? >>> How exactly can this be done? If a gem creates five executables, would >>> this mean that this gem comes in six ebuilds? >> well given the next answer,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-14 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 14 May 2009 18:34:29 + (UTC) Sven wrote: > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan cox.net> writes: > > FWIW, that'd not be a portage issue per se, but an EAPI issue, > > since it > > I see, very interesting! Sounds like a lengthy process, but never > mind. Do you know where EAPI changes are discussed?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-05-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 12 mai 2009 à 22:55 +0200, Sven Schwyn a écrit : > Gilles wrote: > > so this wrapper could be installed in a separate eselect sort of > > package ? > How exactly can this be done? If a gem creates five executables, would > this mean that this gem comes in six ebuilds? well given the nex