On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 04:53 +, Sam James wrote:
> I fear this sort of assumes we won't switch to monobuild any time soon.
I don't see one precluding the other. Categories are cheap. Package
moves not necessarily, but switching to monorepo will be complete pain
whether one more package move i
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 04:11 +, Sam James wrote:
> I'm not sure if I'm sold on *two*. What happens for stuff like mlir
> where it's not a runtime but it's arguably more of one than core?
>
> It just doesn't feel like the division works great. Or maybe it's just
> because I feel like llvm-core w
On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 04:53:58AM +, Sam James wrote:
> I fear this sort of assumes we won't switch to monobuild any time soon.
>
> I keep thinking [0] about how sustainable our current setup is:
> * Fedora moved away from it for >=18 [1].
> * As we saw with offload, it broke a few times in j
Michał Górny writes:
> Hello,
>
> Given that the number of LLVM packages is growing, and probably will
> grow again (I'm introducing "offload" right now, expect at least MLIR
> soon, there are open requests for flang, polly...), I'd like to propose
> creating dedicated categories for these packag
Michał Górny writes:
> Hello,
>
> Given that the number of LLVM packages is growing, and probably will
> grow again (I'm introducing "offload" right now, expect at least MLIR
> soon, there are open requests for flang, polly...), I'd like to propose
> creating dedicated categories for these packag
