19.06.2014 06:01, Jeroen Roovers пишет:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:43:34 +0400
> Sergey Popov wrote:
>
>> As we should not do anything crazy with DOCS and HTML_DOCS, let's
>> simplify our eclass
>
> Looks good. What ebuilds would be affected (i.e. simplifying them)?
Behaviour could be changed for
19.06.2014 05:25, hasufell пишет:
> Sergey Popov:
>> As we should not do anything crazy with DOCS and HTML_DOCS, let's
>> simplify our eclass
>>
>
> Just deprecate the whole eclass. I don't see much useful stuff there
> except running base.eclass phases and that is already discouraged wrt
> #49705
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:43:34 +0400
Sergey Popov wrote:
> As we should not do anything crazy with DOCS and HTML_DOCS, let's
> simplify our eclass
Looks good. What ebuilds would be affected (i.e. simplifying them)?
jer
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 01:25:03 +
hasufell wrote:
> Sergey Popov:
> > As we should not do anything crazy with DOCS and HTML_DOCS, let's
> > simplify our eclass
> >
>
> Just deprecate the whole eclass. I don't see much useful stuff there
You have got to be kidding.
jer
Sergey Popov:
> As we should not do anything crazy with DOCS and HTML_DOCS, let's
> simplify our eclass
>
Just deprecate the whole eclass. I don't see much useful stuff there
except running base.eclass phases and that is already discouraged wrt
#497050. If you remove those parts, not much is left
