Re: [gentoo-dev] GuideXML editor, tidyGuide and Google SoC

2006-05-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OOo etc could make editing more productive for those not familiar > with XML odds - just imagine why translation of Gentoo doc is > so slow and weak? Because you basically have to do everything yourself. Yup, you get some contributions from your users, but those are of v

RE: [gentoo-dev] GuideXML editor, tidyGuide and Google SoC

2006-05-08 Thread achumakov
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > (snipped) > > Templates seem a bit . . . hackish. Mostly we also need > documentation writers to be/who are comfortable with working > with the XML code itself, tags and all. First of all, we need _documentation_ and _documentation wr

Re: [gentoo-dev] GuideXML editor, tidyGuide and Google SoC

2006-05-08 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (snipped) Templates seem a bit . . . hackish. Mostly we also need documentation writers to be/who are comfortable with working with the XML code itself, tags and all. WYSIWYG editors just don't strike me as a good idea for w