> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Jack Morgan wrote:
> I can't find any documented details for "unstable keywords" besides
> the man pages listed above.
It is defined in the PMS [1]:
~arch: The package version and the ebuild are believed to work and
do not have any known serious bugs, but more t
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 01:59:37PM +0200, Ch??-Thanh Christopher Nguy???n wrote:
> Jack Morgan schrieb:
> > I find this confusing and hope to clear it up. According to emerge/portage
> > man pages we have stable keywords (ARCH) and unstable packages (~ARCH) while
> > the handbook[1] says we have st
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> There is stable and not stable. Whether you call what is not stable
> "unstable" or "testing" does not matter, as Gentoo does not
> differentiate between the two. FWIW, I think that using the word testing
> implies some sort of
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:59:37 +0200
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Jack Morgan schrieb:
> > I find this confusing and hope to clear it up. According to
> > emerge/portage man pages we have stable keywords (ARCH) and
> > unstable packages (~ARCH) while the handbook[1] says we have stable
> >
Jack Morgan schrieb:
> I find this confusing and hope to clear it up. According to emerge/portage
> man pages we have stable keywords (ARCH) and unstable packages (~ARCH) while
> the handbook[1] says we have stable keywords (ARCH) and testing keywords
> (~ARCH).
There is stable and not stable. Whe
I find this confusing and hope to clear it up. According to emerge/portage
man pages we have stable keywords (ARCH) and unstable packages (~ARCH) while
the handbook[1] says we have stable keywords (ARCH) and testing keywords
(~ARCH). I think the handbook is more accurate:
"The testing branch is e
