On 03/01/2013 11:30, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>
>
> Feel free to steal the code used in eselect-pinentry.
>
> It was originally written by mgorny for eselect-sh, but then later
> modified by me, and has not had a single bug ever since.
Can I reiterate that it'd be cool to have an "eselect tools"?
On 03/01/13 03:28, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/2013 06:11 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
I'm confident no one woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/2013 06:11 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
>> wrote:
>>> I'm confident no one would
>>> attempt to block my adding eselect-bzi
El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
> wrote:
> > I'm confident no one would
> > attempt to block my adding eselect-bzip2 to the tree (aside from my poor
> > coding skills),
>
> ++
>
> > but would anyone be inte
29.10.2012 18:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
>> but would anyone be interested in blocking using lbzip2
>> by default? It seems pretty safe and I've done dozens of full system
>> builds etc.
>
> Why not just make it an option to start, adverti
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
> I'm confident no one would
> attempt to block my adding eselect-bzip2 to the tree (aside from my poor
> coding skills),
++
> but would anyone be interested in blocking using lbzip2
> by default? It seems pretty safe and I've do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/27/2012 05:23 AM, Piotr Szymaniak wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:43:27PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>>> media be
Am 27.09.2012 09:22, schrieb Florian Philipp:
> Am 26.09.2012 23:53, schrieb Michael Mol:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Florian Philipp
>> wrote:
>>> Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 42365
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Michael Mol wrote:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the
> install media be replaced with pbzip2. It was closed a short while
> later, telling me that it'd involve changing what's kept in @system,
> and that had to be discussed here, rather than
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:43:27PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> > A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
> > media be replaced with
> > pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
> > involve c
Hi!
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> A different question is whether in the cases where parallel bzip2 makes
> sense, is it really the best solution? xz is outperforming bzip2's
> compression ratio for large files (for an informal comparison, see bug
> 434350). And xz is
Am 26.09.2012 23:53, schrieb Michael Mol:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Florian Philipp
> wrote:
>> Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be repl
On 26/09/2012 15:57, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> That sound like a plan. Maybe bzip2 should become a virtual as busybox
> also provides an implementation.
No, just, no.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> 2012/9/26 Mike Gilbert :
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
>>> wrote:
Michael Mol schrieb:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask th
2012/9/26 Mike Gilbert :
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
>> wrote:
>>> Michael Mol schrieb:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be replaced with
pbzip2.
>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> wrote:
>> Michael Mol schrieb:
>>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>>> media be replaced with
>>> pbzip2.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, p
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Michael Mol schrieb:
>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>> media be replaced with
>> pbzip2.
>
> If I understand correctly, pbzip2 depends on bzip2. So what you are
> asking is that pbzip2
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>>> media be replaced with
>>> pbzip2. It was closed a short while
Michael Mol schrieb:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
> media be replaced with
> pbzip2.
If I understand correctly, pbzip2 depends on bzip2. So what you are
asking is that pbzip2 is preferred over bzip2 when both are installed,
and that pbzip2 is installed b
Am 26.09.2012 22:43, schrieb Matt Turner:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
>> media be replaced with
>> pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
>> involve changing what's kept in
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
> media be replaced with
> pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
> involve changing what's kept in @system, and that had to be discussed
> here, ra
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be replaced with
pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
involve changing what's kept in @system, and that had to be discussed
here, rather than in a bug report.
Here's a detailed description of ho
22 matches
Mail list logo
