Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: vdr - topic reanimated

2006-07-11 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Monday 10 July 2006 10:08, Jakub Moc wrote: > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: > >> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote: > >>> c is simpler. I like it. > >> > >> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metad

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: vdr - topic reanimated

2006-07-10 Thread Jakub Moc
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: >> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote: >>> c is simpler. I like it. >> Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to >> tag and assigning to that even

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: vdr - topic reanimated

2006-07-09 Thread Ioannis Aslanidis
On 7/10/06, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: > On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote: > > c is simpler. I like it. > Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to > ta

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: vdr - topic reanimated

2006-07-09 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 19:17:09 +0200 Matthias Schwarzott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > As the situation now has changed I would like to discuss this one > more. Since one week we (hd_brummy and me) have changed our Gentoo > VDR Project > (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/video/vdr/index.

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: vdr - topic reanimated

2006-07-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 04:36:55AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: > On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote: > > c is simpler. I like it. > Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to > tag and assigning to that even when a particular maintainer

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: vdr - topic reanimated

2006-07-09 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 10 July 2006 02:25, Luca Barbato wrote: > c is simpler. I like it. Yes, of course if _all wranglers_ respected metadata, instead of stopping to tag and assigning to that even when a particular maintainer is listed. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: vdr - topic reanimated

2006-07-09 Thread Luca Barbato
Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > What do you think of that? c is simpler. I like it. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: vdr - topic reanimated

2006-07-09 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
Hi! As the situation now has changed I would like to discuss this one more. Since one week we (hd_brummy and me) have changed our Gentoo VDR Project (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/video/vdr/index.xml) to an official subproject of desktop/video. Now the situation is as follows: Most pack