On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 8:19 AM Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>
> On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote:
> > ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch.
> >
> > If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of
> > their users better, and it isn't causing pr
On 20.10.2018 15:26, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> On Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018 14:22:04 CEST Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>> No, keywords status is irrelevant, it is for the security team meaning
>> that they can
>> release a glsa w/o waiting for the stabilization of the security
>> unsupported arches
On Samstag, 20. Oktober 2018 14:22:04 CEST Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> No, keywords status is irrelevant, it is for the security team meaning
> that they can
> release a glsa w/o waiting for the stabilization of the security
> unsupported arches
In my experience glsa only happens after cleanup, and cle
On 20.10.2018 15:19, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote:
>> ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch.
>>
>> If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of
>> their users better, and it isn't causing problems for anybo
On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote:
> ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch.
>
> If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of
> their users better, and it isn't causing problems for anybody else,
> I'm not sure why we should be interfering wit
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> But that's not the point here. The point was to get some attention that
> again we have a lacking architecture (net-dns/dnssec-root is not the
> only package where ARM arch team is lacking behind) which affects anyone
> "trusting" someh
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:14:00 +0200
Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > 1) Someone blind-stabled something on arm and it broke (doesn't
> > build?) 2) The arm team failed to mark a package stable before a
> > hard deadline (DNSSEC key rotation)
"Blind-stabled"...
> But that's not the point here. The p
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 02:40:38 +0200
Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2018-10-12 01:38, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> >> Maybe it is time to destabilize ARM on Gentoo to stop the impression
> >> that we really support ARM.
> >
> > [ CC: arm@ ]
> >
> > A few points to think about:
> >
> > 1. I have
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 4:38 PM Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 17:10:10 +0200
> Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> > Let me quote
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f6f6bb91b7f134a121ef9fa1dd504b9ca52c5aa8:
> >
> > > net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, c
On 2018-10-12 01:38, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>> Maybe it is time to destabilize ARM on Gentoo to stop the impression
>> that we really support ARM.
>
> [ CC: arm@ ]
>
> A few points to think about:
>
> 1. I have read this as a direct statement that ARM is not maintained.
>I don't think it
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 17:10:10 +0200
Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Let me quote
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f6f6bb91b7f134a121ef9fa1dd504b9ca52c5aa8:
>
> > net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774
> >
> > Note that this is a major fail for a stable a
On October 11, 2018 19:05:43 Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
On 2018-10-11 17:45, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
What's a "blind stable"? I'm guessing stabilizing without testing? If
yes, why?
Yes, stabilized without testing.
Reason: No ARM arch team member with access to an ARM box was availa
On 2018-10-11 17:48, Alec Warner wrote:
> This thread is missing a bunch of context...so I'll try to add it I guess.
All you need to know in this commit message, included linked bug report
for more details. :)
> I can't tell if the complaint is that:
>
> 1) Someone blind-stabled something on ar
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 1:05 PM Thomas Deutschmann
wrote:
> On 2018-10-11 17:45, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
> > What's a "blind stable"? I'm guessing stabilizing without testing? If
> > yes, why?
>
> Yes, stabilized without testing.
>
> Reason: No ARM arch team member with access to an ARM bo
On 2018-10-11 17:45, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
> What's a "blind stable"? I'm guessing stabilizing without testing? If
> yes, why?
Yes, stabilized without testing.
Reason: No ARM arch team member with access to an ARM box was available
for the last ~7 days.
However, this update is critical
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:10 AM Thomas Deutschmann
wrote:
> Let me quote
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f6f6bb91b7f134a121ef9fa1dd504b9ca52c5aa8
> :
>
This thread is missing a bunch of context...so I'll try to add it I guess.
>
> > net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on
October 11, 2018 5:10 PM, "Thomas Deutschmann" wrote:
> Let me quote
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f6f6bb91b7f134a121ef9fa1dd504b9ca52c5aa8:
>
>> net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774
>>
>> Note that this is a major fail for a stable architecture
Let me quote
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f6f6bb91b7f134a121ef9fa1dd504b9ca52c5aa8:
> net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774
>
> Note that this is a major fail for a stable architecture.
> In addition, all arm devboxes are currently offline.
>
> Bu
18 matches
Mail list logo
