On Tuesday 31 May 2005 01:38 pm, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Vapier wrote: [Tue May 31 2005, 10:16:06AM EDT]
>
> > personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others
> > think we should use ? just stick with bzlib since it's what we've
> > had it for a while now ?
>
> I'd prefer bzip2
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:16:06AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ah, was not aware of said flag ... yes they should be unified ...
Agreed.
> personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others think we
> should use ? just stick with bzlib since it's what we've had it for a whil
Vapier wrote: [Tue May 31 2005, 10:16:06AM EDT]
> personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others
> think we should use ? just stick with bzlib since it's what we've
> had it for a while now ?
I'd prefer bzip2
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpr0BSR3puGD.pgp
Desc
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 09:41 am, Daniel Westermann-Clark wrote:
> On 2005-05-31 00:56:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > anyone have probs with moving bzip2 to global ? we currently
> > utilize it in gnupg, xqf, mkvtoolnix, tar, and we could use it in
> > portage in the future
>
> Some ebuilds us
On 2005-05-31 00:56:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> anyone have probs with moving bzip2 to global ? we currently
> utilize it in gnupg, xqf, mkvtoolnix, tar, and we could use it in
> portage in the future
Some ebuilds use the global bzlib USE flag, is another necessary?
Maybe it should be renam
anyone have probs with moving bzip2 to global ? we currently utilize it in
gnupg, xqf, mkvtoolnix, tar, and we could use it in portage in the future
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
