On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:37:30 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
>
> Sounds like a good idea!
>
>
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:37:30 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
>
> Sounds like a good idea!
>
>
Hello, all.
Long story short: while working on various metadata.xml-related
aspects, it bite us pretty hard that we lack proper spec for
metadata.xml file. What we have is pretty much the DTD, some partial
GLEPs (that sometimes provide incorrect info) and random bugs. ml
posts...
Therefore, I've
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
Sounds like a good idea!
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:68
I reviewed your spec bas
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:42:59 +0100
Johannes Huber wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 16 März 2016, 19:43:21 schrieb Michał Górny:
> > Hello, all.
> >
> > Long story short: while working on various metadata.xml-related
> > aspects, it bite us pretty hard that we lack proper spec for
> > metadata.xml file. What
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2016, 19:43:21 schrieb Michał Górny:
> Hello, all.
>
> Long story short: while working on various metadata.xml-related
> aspects, it bite us pretty hard that we lack proper spec for
> metadata.xml file. What we have is pretty much the DTD, some partial
> GLEPs (that sometimes p
