Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Kito
On Jul 11, 2005, at 7:32 AM, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make install" is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not good. A solution can be to im

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:02:52 +0200 Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > Anything using a standardish autotools install can potentially | > explode when parallelised. | | That wasn't very informative... Feel free to hire me

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Anything using a standardish autotools install can potentially explode > when parallelised. That wasn't very informative... ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd signature.a

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:32:06 +0200 Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: | > Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make | > install" is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's | >

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 11 July 2005 14:32, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Why not check which phase you're in instead? That also can be done, true. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) pgpC1VHMPecuU.pgp Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make install" > is > a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not good. > A solution can be to improve emake wrapper to check if "install" is in its >

Re: [gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:20:20 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make | install" is a no-go because it uses -jX from make.conf and that's not | good. A solution can be to improve emake wrapper to check if "ins

[gentoo-dev] make and wrappers

2005-07-11 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Following the discussion me and Azarah had about make commands, I've started thinking of a way to fix this without being too intrusive and I found a bit of a solution following Az's suggestion to use a wrapper script. Let's see: we already have an emake script, but using it for "make install" is