Re: [gentoo-dev] imlate x86 Editon and more x86 fun

2005-08-12 Thread Olivier Crete
On Fri, 2005-12-08 at 13:53 +0900, Chris White wrote: > I really do agree with not only this, but the need for stable marking > as well. Gentoo is very bleeding edge at this point, and I feel that > stable packages are somewhat lacking. However, the problems I see is > what is considered "Let the

Re: [gentoo-dev] imlate x86 Editon and more x86 fun

2005-08-11 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:15:17PM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote: > After Ciaran's comment on -core, I wondered how imlate would fare on > x86. For those who are not familiar with it, imlate list all packages on > one architecture that are outdated compared to another architecture. All > other archite

Re: [gentoo-dev] imlate x86 Editon and more x86 fun

2005-08-11 Thread Chris White
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:15:17 -0400 Olivier Crête <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We really need to form an x86 team... > > -- > Olivier Crête > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > x86 Security Liaison I really do agree with not only this, but the need for stable marking as well. Gentoo is very bleeding edge a

[gentoo-dev] imlate x86 Editon and more x86 fun

2005-08-11 Thread Olivier Crête
Hi, After Ciaran's comment on -core, I wondered how imlate would fare on x86. For those who are not familiar with it, imlate list all packages on one architecture that are outdated compared to another architecture. All other architectures use x86 as a reference.. That clearly didn't work for us. S