> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Rich Freeman wrote:
> It isn't entirely clear that anything is actually broken at the
> moment, but if distributing an empty herds.xml file makes somebody's
> life easier I have no objections.
In fact, GLEP 67 implies that the herds.xml file is to be removed
altogether,
On Friday 09 June 2006 03:08, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:54:08AM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> > On 6/9/06, Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >So, what would people think of moving herds.xml from gentoo/misc into
> > >the portage tree, with the rationale being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
> Well, all that's required is modification to rsync gen script;
I'll do it, assuming that a location has been agreed upon.
$PORTDIR/metadata/herds.xml is the place?
Zac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:49:58AM +1000, Daniel wrote:
> On Sunday 11 June 2006 12:50, Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:08:23PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 08 June 2006 21:08, Brian Harring wro
On Sunday 11 June 2006 12:50, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:08:23PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Thursday 08 June 2006 21:08, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > > One additional to this- the location for the file in
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:08:23PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 June 2006 21:08, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > One additional to this- the location for the file in the tree *should*
> > > be metadata/ - shoving it into pro
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 21:08, Brian Harring wrote:
> > One additional to this- the location for the file in the tree *should*
> > be metadata/ - shoving it into profiles is the wrong location (it's
> > not profile data, it's repo metadata
On Thursday 08 June 2006 21:08, Brian Harring wrote:
> One additional to this- the location for the file in the tree *should*
> be metadata/ - shoving it into profiles is the wrong location (it's
> not profile data, it's repo metadata).
that is the correct location for it but we have no metadata t
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:54:08AM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So, what would people think of moving herds.xml from gentoo/misc into
> >the portage tree, with the rationale being that local tools could use
> >that information for various
On 6/9/06, Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, what would people think of moving herds.xml from gentoo/misc into
the portage tree, with the rationale being that local tools could use
that information for various useful purposes (compiling statistics,
doing something that I can't think o
So, what would people think of moving herds.xml from gentoo/misc into
the portage tree, with the rationale being that local tools could use
that information for various useful purposes (compiling statistics,
doing something that I can't think of right now, whatever)?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
11 matches
Mail list logo
