On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 20:22:54 +0200 Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Any plans on moving webapp-config as an eselect module? :-)
That one's way beyond the scope of what eselect was designed for.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 20:22 +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
> Any plans on moving webapp-config as an eselect module? :-)
No.
Best regards,
Stu
--
Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Huddleston skrev:
> I've recently updated opengl-update to use the eselect framework. I
> think the team has done a great job as it was extremely easy to port the
> bash script to an eselect module. However, when I placed it in the
> portage t
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
I've recently updated opengl-update to use the eselect framework. I
think the team has done a great job as it was extremely easy to port the
bash script to an eselect module. However, when I placed it in the
portage tree, it sparked a little bit of a policy discussion b
> My opinion is this: Keeping eselect modules inside eselect's SVN repo
> results in:
> a) More eyes reading the code (read: QA)
I think the point you're trying to make here is that the QA is easier to
accomplish for you, and that certainly is true.
I think having modules in app-admin/eselect-/fi
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:52:25 +0200 Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| b) The possibility to change all modules in one move in case we change
| ~ something like a default behaviour, or function names, etc.
That kind of thing shouldn't happen once a stable release is out...
--
Ciaran McC
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:38:08 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| There's also the size issue. I use opengl-update on the LiveCD
| builds, and have exactly zero need for *any* other eselect module, so
| why should I be required to have them all to just get the one that I
| need?
He
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeremy,
(Just a note: the follwing expresses my opinion, i don't speak for the
other eselect devs)
Jeremy Huddleston schrieb:
| I've recently updated opengl-update to use the eselect framework. I
| think the team has done a great job as it was e
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 12:21 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> | The eselect developers want to keep all eselect modules in their svn
> | repository and distributed through a single package (app-admin/eselect).
> | Their m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
| The eselect developers want to keep all eselect modules in their svn
| repository and distributed through a single package (app-admin/eselect).
| Their main reasons for this are better QA and less overhead for releases
| and
I've recently updated opengl-update to use the eselect framework. I
think the team has done a great job as it was extremely easy to port the
bash script to an eselect module. However, when I placed it in the
portage tree, it sparked a little bit of a policy discussion between
myself and the core
11 matches
Mail list logo
