Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
>>> There are probably also lot of things using insinto
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
>>> I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
>>> use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
>> There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
>> /etc/conf.
On Monday 09 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
> > I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
> > use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
>
> There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
> /etc/conf.d too that should be fixe
On Monday 09 April 2007 05:39:29 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> > As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is
>
> doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d`
>
> > Does it make sense to allow both styles?
>
> not really
>
> >
Marcelo Góes kirjoitti:
> Hello,
>
> I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
> use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
>
There are probably also lot of things using insinto /etc/init.d and
/etc/conf.d too that should be fixed.
Regards,
Petter
signature.asc
Desc
On Sunday 08 April 2007, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is
doenvd was written specifically to replace `insinto /etc/env.d`
> Does it make sense to allow both styles?
not really
> Is it worth it to convert everything to doenvd?
yes please
-mike
pg
Hello,
I just did a quick grep of the tree and found 129 ebuilds that
use doenvd and 134 that use insinto /etc/env.d.
As far as I can see, doenvd is more correct because it is
1) cleaner and easier to read
2) more portable (for systems that use something other than
/etc/env.d, for example)
Does
