On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 00:30 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 of September 2005 10:31 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > What should be changed, Handbook or profiles?
>
> Any progress on this subject?
No. It doesn't look like any decision was made.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strateg
On Tuesday 27 of September 2005 10:31 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> What should be changed, Handbook or profiles?
Any progress on this subject?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
pgpiunsPox2Er.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 17:09 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> How about we just use sysklogd ? It does not depend on glib or any
> other package that would not be pulled in by default in system profile.
> It have a sane config. It logs to /var/log/message, etc. It supports
> network logging. Bla
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 13:05 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:47:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 01:29 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:57 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > > I'd rather see reasons listed as to why
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:57:26AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Agreed. It should be syslog-ng. If nobody objects, I'll change it in
> > base/virtuals.
>
> Objecting, obviously ;)
[...]
> I'd rather see reasons listed as to why syslog-ng is a superior
> default for users who (most likely) do
28.9.2005, 2:50:20, Alec Warner wrote:
>>
> I think syslog-ng is a better logger, except the default configuration
> is pretty icky. I would shoot for something better, even if it's in
> /usr/share. I heard hardened's config is quite nice :) At least
> provide an example of a config that so
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Agreed. It should be syslog-ng. If nobody objects, I'll change it in
base/virtuals.
I'd keep metalog as default OR fix the syslog-ng default configuration.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 02:59 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Ok, for those who don't remember...
|
| In the good old days, syslog-ng was the default. Then, for one of the
| releases, the x86 team accidentally included metalog instead of
| syslo
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 02:59 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | Ok, for those who don't remember...
> |
> | In the good old days, syslog-ng was the default. Then, for one of the
> | releases, the x86 team accidentally included metalog instead of
> | syslog-ng on the distf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
| Re: it being a temporary change that should be undone, it's been
| around long enough I won't call it 'temporary' at this point.
Oh, so if we screwed up a year ago, we shouldn't fix it. If you won't
call that temporary, I won't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Ok, for those who don't remember...
|
| In the good old days, syslog-ng was the default. Then, for one of the
| releases, the x86 team accidentally included metalog instead of
| syslog-ng on the distfiles CD, so the default wa
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:47:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 01:29 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:57 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > I'd rather see reasons listed as to why syslog-ng is a superior
> > > default for users who (most likely
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:47:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| because someone changed it doesnt mean it should have been changed
Ok, for those who don't remember...
In the good old days, syslog-ng was the default. Then, for one of the
releases, the x86 team accidentally included
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 01:29 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:57 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Basically... why?
> >
> > I'm neither advocating being different to be different, nor following
> > others so howtos about their stuff fit to ours. I'm after
> > the underly
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 11:57 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> Basically... why?
>
> I'm neither advocating being different to be different, nor following
> others so howtos about their stuff fit to ours. I'm after
> the underlying reasons why general users should be using syslog-ng over
> metalog
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:27:34AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:39 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:31:04AM +0200, Jan Kundr??t wrote:
> > > our documentation [1] lists syslog-ng as the "default" system logger
> > > while current profile
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:39 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:31:04AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > our documentation [1] lists syslog-ng as the "default" system logger
> > while current profiles uses metalog (except embedded, default-macos/ppc,
> > default-darwin and
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 10:39, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:31:04AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > our documentation [1] lists syslog-ng as the "default" system logger
> > while current profiles uses metalog (except embedded, default-macos/ppc,
> > default-darwin and
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:31:04AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> our documentation [1] lists syslog-ng as the "default" system logger
> while current profiles uses metalog (except embedded, default-macos/ppc,
> default-darwin and sparc32). What should be changed, Handbook or profiles?
I think we sho
Hi,
our documentation [1] lists syslog-ng as the "default" system logger
while current profiles uses metalog (except embedded, default-macos/ppc,
default-darwin and sparc32). What should be changed, Handbook or profiles?
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/hb-install-tools.xml
TIA,
-jkt
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
