On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 09:08 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:28:26 -0700
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > We disabled it to try to get the size of the x86/amd64 LiveCDs down.
> > Thanks. I knew there had to be some reason for it, but couldn't
> > remembe
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 04:31 +, Luis Medinas wrote:
> Of course you don't need to build all gnome for the livecd and i bet
Umm... yes, we do.
Remember that an offline install requires the packages to exist on the
LiveCD. If we did only half of GNOME, nobody could install GNOME. The
problem i
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le samedi 04 août 2007 à 16:23 -0500, Andrew Gaffney a écrit :
The LiveCD is intended to replace the separate GRP and universal CDs when
combined with the installer. The installer uses the packages installed on the CD
to do the new install. I'm not sure how many
Le samedi 04 août 2007 à 16:23 -0500, Andrew Gaffney a écrit :
> The LiveCD is intended to replace the separate GRP and universal CDs when
> combined with the installer. The installer uses the packages installed on the
> CD
> to do the new install. I'm not sure how many times this has been broug
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le samedi 04 août 2007 à 09:08 +0300, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:28:26 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We disabled it to try to get the size of the x86/amd64 LiveCDs down.
Thanks. I knew there had to be some reason for i
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:28:26 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We disabled it to try to get the size of the x86/amd64 LiveCDs down.
Thanks. I knew there had to be some reason for it, but couldn't
remember what it was off the top of my head. Luckily, thi
Luis Medinas wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 14:28 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Thanks. I knew there had to be some reason for it, but couldn't
remember what it was off the top of my head. Luckily, this won't be
much of an issue with the next release, since we're switching to Xfce
rather than G
Le samedi 04 août 2007 à 09:08 +0300, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
> On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:28:26 -0700
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > We disabled it to try to get the size of the x86/amd64 LiveCDs down.
> > Thanks. I knew there had to be some reason for it, but couldn't
> > r
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:28:26 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We disabled it to try to get the size of the x86/amd64 LiveCDs down.
> Thanks. I knew there had to be some reason for it, but couldn't
> remember what it was off the top of my head. Luckily, this won't be
> much o
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 14:28 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Thanks. I knew there had to be some reason for it, but couldn't
> remember what it was off the top of my head. Luckily, this won't be
> much of an issue with the next release, since we're switching to Xfce
> rather than GNOME to bring t
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 16:18 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 23:39 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > Pretty please for ext4 for the ricers that just *have* to try it and
> > need to recover their systems. It's a good ask as it is *in* the kernel
> > even if marked experimental.
>
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 23:39 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 14:28 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Of course, the LiveDVD
> > will have everything on it, as it does now.
>
>
>
> Pretty please for ext4 for the ricers that just *have* to try it and
> need to recover their syste
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 14:28 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Of course, the LiveDVD
> will have everything on it, as it does now.
Pretty please for ext4 for the ricers that just *have* to try it and
need to recover their systems. It's a good ask as it is *in* the kernel
even if marked experiment
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 14:56 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 18:53 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> >> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Schwier wrote:
> +ppds (everyone has a printer, and this is needed
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 18:53 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Schwier wrote:
+ppds (everyone has a printer, and this is needed to configure it
without further investigations. cups is already in)
+startup
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
>
> One thing to remember, I do *not* consider our desktop profiles to be
> "opt-in" but rather to be a good out-of-box experience for the user. If
> you want to think of the desktop profiles as bloated, feel free to use
> the versioned profile (like 2007.0) instead, a
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 09:09 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Schwier wrote:
> >> +startup-notification
>
> Actually, rereading that list, I wouldn't mind adding this one. Gnome
> and a couple of core Gnome apps hard-depend on it, as
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 18:53 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Schwier wrote:
> >> +ppds (everyone has a printer, and this is needed to configure it
> >> without further investigations. cups is already in)
> >> +startup-notific
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Schwier wrote:
>> +startup-notification
Actually, rereading that list, I wouldn't mind adding this one. Gnome
and a couple of core Gnome apps hard-depend on it, as I am must sure
must be the case in KDE.
Samuli also told me that
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Schwier wrote:
>> +ppds (everyone has a printer, and this is needed to configure it
>> without further investigations. cups is already in)
>> +startup-notification
>
> Well, we don't add local USE flags to the default profile
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Schwier wrote:
> So, these are my proposed changes for the default desktop profile:
>
> +bash-completion
> +bluetooth
> +ffmpeg(totem isn't much without it)
> +libnotify (gives very nice popup notifications in many programs instead
> of an annoying, wo
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Martin Schwier wrote:
> today I posted a bug (187475) about a minor issue about the useflag
> libnotify not beeing in the default desktop profile. Me was told that
> this sould be discussed on gentoo-dev. I can't really understand why
> such a minor issue have to be disc
On 8/2/07, Martin Schwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> today I posted a bug (187475) about a minor issue about the useflag
> libnotify not beeing in the default desktop profile. Me was told that
> this sould be discussed on gentoo-dev. I can't really understand why
> such a mi
Martin Schwier wrote:
> To come to the bug, I'll comment Jakub Moc's last comment:
>
>> As said above - bloating default profiles even more goes to gentoo-dev
>> mailing
>> list, so that people could comment. I for one am already annoyed enough by
>> the
>> nonsense being added there, such as US
Hello developers,
today I posted a bug (187475) about a minor issue about the useflag
libnotify not beeing in the default desktop profile. Me was told that
this sould be discussed on gentoo-dev. I can't really understand why
such a minor issue have to be discussed among all developers as there
are
25 matches
Mail list logo
