On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:09:58PM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Considering that the Code of Conduct is a subset of the regular Gentoo
> developer policies that Developer Relations already enforces, I would
> say that they are definitely enforcing the CoC and have the authority.
> What DevRel c
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:41 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
> So the way i read it devrel would like to do something if requested,
> but isn't supposed to enforce the CoC, nor has the authority?
Considering that the Code of Conduct is a subset of the regular Gentoo
developer policies that Developer R
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:58:43PM -0700, Chrissy Fullam wrote:
> Developer Relations will continue to assist on requests and any extra bit
> that we can. We will see which way this ML thing takes Gentoo and offer our
> support in any way we can.
Nice statement from a PR POV, but i really have pro
Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As far the CoC is concerned, i'm not sure what the current status is
>> and if anyone is supposed to enforce it atm (devrel? userrel?).
> I am sure not devrel. That's one reason we had proctors to begin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:08:31 +0200
Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:11:56PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> > I have always thought that proctors/COC is useless, I vote to remove it.
>
> Proctors have already be
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:11:56PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> I have always thought that proctors/COC is useless, I vote to remove it.
Proctors have already been removed in the last council meeting.
As far the CoC is concerned, i'm not sure what the current status is
and if anyone is suppos
3. Council blew it. They ignore what proctors were doing, killed
COC, and
punted..
++
Poor job or rather interests conflict.
On 7/15/07, Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's one I should sleep on -- I didn't:
Not much.
Very few
Alle domenica 15 luglio 2007, Ferris McCormick ha scritto:
> Here's one I should sleep on -- I didn't:
>
> Not much.
> Very few Comments.
> I'll start them.
> 1. Council is just wrong. They are also just gone.
>
> 2. I am just wrong. Most likely.
>
> 3. Council blew it. They ignore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's one I should sleep on -- I didn't:
Not much.
Very few Comments.
I'll start them.
1. Council is just wrong. They are also just gone.
2. I am just wrong. Most likely.
3. Council blew it. They ignore what proctors were doing, ki
