Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86

2006-07-05 Thread Richard Fish
On 7/5/06, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Okay, if this short question cannot be anwered with an short help or an direct pointer to some help, it seems my contribution obviously isn't wanted. So I won't waste anymore of your and my time on this topic and don't file a bug. Just forget a

Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86

2006-07-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Sorry if that doesn't sound very nice, but could you please stop posting > to this list every time you have an issue, especially if the information > you are looking for is easily available (here for instance, just click > on the hyperlinks to se

Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86

2006-07-05 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Wed, Jul 5, 2006 at 19:15:50 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > > > Please file it with the maintainer/herd of the package, instead of > > directly to the arch team you want it stable. In this case x86. It > > makes it easier for the arch team

Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86

2006-07-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Please file it with the maintainer/herd of the package, instead of > directly to the arch team you want it stable. In this case x86. It > makes it easier for the arch team to not have to filter through bugs > and track down maintainers ourselves.

Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86

2006-07-05 Thread Joshua Jackson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've just seen, current bugzilla is masked, and DBD::Pg too. As the > documentation states "~x86" means, it's working, but not properly > tested on this platform (ie. x86). > > How does the process of proving packa

Re: [gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86

2006-07-05 Thread Krzysiek Pawlik
Enrico Weigelt wrote: > How does the process of proving packages work ? Please file a stabilization bug on b.g.o with ebuild version and `emerge --info`. -- Krzysiek Pawlik key id: 0xBC51 desktop-misc, desktop-dock, desktop-wm, x86, java, apache... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

[gentoo-dev] bugzilla 2.22 masked ~x86

2006-07-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, I've just seen, current bugzilla is masked, and DBD::Pg too. As the documentation states "~x86" means, it's working, but not properly tested on this platform (ie. x86). How does the process of proving packages work ? I've made good experiences with bugzilla-2.22 - the whole install