Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-19 Thread Philip Webb
060618 Dan Meltzer wrote: > On 6/18/06, Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There is something not quite right about 'testing/stable' as it exists now >> -- no, repeat no, criticism of hardworking developers implied -- : >> might it help everyone if instead we had 'testing/desktop/server' ? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 18 June 2006 14:11, Roy Marples wrote: > On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: > > > I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, > > > even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Dan Meltzer
On 6/18/06, Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 060618 Roy Marples wrote: > On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: >>> I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, >>> even if they're only 95 % reliabl

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Philip Webb
060618 Roy Marples wrote: > On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: >>> I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, >>> even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). >> people are *not* happy when the

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Roy Marples
On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: > > I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, > > even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). > > people are *not* happy when their machine cannot boot > -mi

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 18 June 2006 04:32, Philip Webb wrote: > I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, > even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). people are *not* happy when their machine cannot boot -mike pgp7nVT5KH2DY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-18 Thread Philip Webb
060617 Mike Frysinger wrote: > can people give 1.11.15-r3 a run through ? I've been using 1.12.0-r1 since 060604 without any problems ... (smile) I suspect most users wb happy to see packages stabilised a bit sooner, even if they're only 95 % reliable (another smile). -- =

[gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.15-r3 testing for stable

2006-06-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
hrm ... i sent this like a week ago, but seems it never got through ... can people give 1.11.15-r3 a run through ? as always, 1.11.x is a bugfix version only (for the most part :D) -mike pgpCHKfpV0WRF.pgp Description: PGP signature