Re: [gentoo-dev] bacula needs lovin'!

2005-06-16 Thread Rob Holland
A few people stepped up to help with this, but nothing visible has happened. Is work being done on this? -- rob holland - [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] - Gentoo Audit Team [ 5251 4FAC D684 8845 5604 E44F D65C 392F D91B 4729 ] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] bacula needs lovin'!

2005-06-02 Thread Omkhar Arasaratnam
Rob Holland wrote: >On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:56:13PM +0100, Rob Holland wrote: > > > >>Can someone please take a look at the bacula ebuilds, they really do >>suck and have several open bugs. >> >> > >Ok, no one has stepped up to maintain them. I'll give it till Wednesday, >then I'll mask t

Re: [gentoo-dev] bacula needs lovin'!

2005-05-27 Thread Rob Holland
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:56:13PM +0100, Rob Holland wrote: > Can someone please take a look at the bacula ebuilds, they really do > suck and have several open bugs. Ok, no one has stepped up to maintain them. I'll give it till Wednesday, then I'll mask them. They really are awful ebuilds. --

[gentoo-dev] bacula needs lovin'!

2005-05-22 Thread Rob Holland
Ey peeps, Can someone please take a look at the bacula ebuilds, they really do suck and have several open bugs. Quite how any of them are marked stable I dunno. They could use a new maintainer, seems zul is now inactive. Cheers, Rob -- rob holland - [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] - Gentoo Audit Team