On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:59 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a quick update on this:
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:20:38PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
>> wrote:
>> > I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do
Hi all,
here is a quick update on this:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:20:38PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> wrote:
> > I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
> > That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 Febr
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:37:15PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> >> On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> >
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
>> > wrote:
>> >> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious wha
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> > wrote:
> >> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
> >> That version of pybugz worked for me be
On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> wrote:
>> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
>> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
> I'm guessing it was broken by th
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Ian Whyman wrote:
> On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner wrote:
Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
>>>
>>> XML-RPC is shit.
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/03/12 04:04 AM, Ian Whyman wrote:
> On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner
>> wrote:
Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use
Bugzilla's XML-RPC api to avoid such
On 27 March 2012 08:33, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner wrote:
>>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
>>> XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
>>
>> XML-RPC is shit.
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
>
Shame that it
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 20:44, Alec Warner wrote:
>> Long term, we may want to consider porting pybugz to use Bugzilla's
>> XML-RPC api to avoid such breakage.
>
> XML-RPC is shit.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:REST_API
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
> wrote:
>> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
>> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>
> I'm guessing it
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it.
> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012).
>
> Any ideas?
>
I'm guessing it was broken by the upgrade from Bugzilla 4.0 to Bugzilla 4.2.
I th
If you wonder why I stopped filing new stabilization request, the
pybugz-based script that was filing those bugs started failing.
I have added some debugging statements to see what's going on, and
here's what https://bugs.gentoo.org says as a response to pybugz's
request to create a new bug:
13 matches
Mail list logo
