Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> I think the only arch-specific ones I know on global are the
> mmx/mmxex/mmx2/3dnow/3dnowex/sse flags.
Maybe also "altivec"?
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 22:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> erm i was trying to trick you into doing arch/os specific ones, not just os
> specific :):)
I think the only arch-specific ones I know on global are the
mmx/mmxex/mmx2/3dnow/3dnowex/sse flags.
I really don't know what other can be removed as
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 07:06 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:57:29PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> > On Monday 18 April 2005 20:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > if by commit you mean the profiles then i think you should go make a
> > > list of specific USE flags and dro
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:57:29PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> On Monday 18 April 2005 20:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > if by commit you mean the profiles then i think you should go make a list
> > of specific USE flags and drop it onto the gentoo-dev list before
> > committing :p:p -
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 03:57 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> This is the list of *global* flags which are linux specific:
erm i was trying to trick you into doing arch/os specific ones, not just os
specific :)
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 18 April 2005 20:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if by commit you mean the profiles then i think you should go make a list
> of specific USE flags and drop it onto the gentoo-dev list before
> committing :p:p -mike
Ok here we are :) This is the list of *global* flags which are linux specific
On Monday 18 April 2005 05:56 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 18 April 2005 04:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > this probably falls along side the USE refactoring someone else suggested
> > where we use.mask everything in base/use.mask that is arch-specific and
> > only unmask in appr
On Monday 18 April 2005 04:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this probably falls along side the USE refactoring someone else suggested
> where we use.mask everything in base/use.mask that is arch-specific and
> only unmask in appropriate profiles
So what? This, imho, should be done also for alsa and oss
On Sunday 17 April 2005 08:07 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Now what? I'm going to ask here what to do with this. I think the right way
> should be adding v4l to base/use.mask and then -v4l on
> default-linux/use.mask, as it's strictly-linux thing.
this probably falls along side the USE r
Hi,
I don't remember why I started looking at avifile this night, but while I was
at it, I found something which uncovers a bit of troubles with v4l useflag.
Summarizing:
v4l useflag enables Video4Linux support (usually webcams and tv cards) on many
multimedia softwares (like avifile, but not o
10 matches
Mail list logo
