Paul de Vrieze a écrit :
As a service to users, you might want to create an empty library:
touch foo.c
gcc -shared foo.c -o libxcb-x11.so.0.0.0
That's all
Like Samuli said, it's a hack and doing that would be wrong. I will not
trade short-term peace of mind for a long term hell for whoever w
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just a quick heads up that I have just unmasked x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 and its
>> companion libraries in all profiles _except_ 2008.0.
> As a service to users, you might want to create an empty library:
>
> touch foo.c
> gcc -sh
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Just a quick heads up that I have just unmasked x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 and its
>>> companion libraries in all profile
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just a quick heads up that I have just unmasked x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 and its
>> companion libraries in all profiles _except_ 2008.0.
>
> Hey Rémi,
> Next time, mind running e
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick heads up that I have just unmasked x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 and its
> companion libraries in all profiles _except_ 2008.0.
Hey Rémi,
Next time, mind running echangelog in the appropriate directory? It
help us look at a glan
Hi all,
Just a quick heads up that I have just unmasked x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 and
its companion libraries in all profiles _except_ 2008.0.
As some of you have already found out, since 1.2, libxcb stopped
shipping a very specific library: libxcb-xlib.so. This library was only
ever meant to be u
