On Saturday 16 April 2005 03:53, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2005 15:14, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > If this actually scared anybody (that received it), my apologies. I was
> > confused about bugs. Fixing the flat profiles will be problem either. The
> > bug is that 2.0.50 will die if tw
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:53:41PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2005 15:14, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > If this actually scared anybody (that received it), my apologies. I was
> > confused about bugs. Fixing the flat profiles will be problem either. The
> > bug is that 2.0.50 will
On Friday 15 April 2005 15:14, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> If this actually scared anybody (that received it), my apologies. I was
> confused about bugs. Fixing the flat profiles will be problem either. The
> bug is that 2.0.50 will die if two profiles in a cascade define the same
> variable.
Then make
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:14:59 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| If this actually scared anybody (that received it), my apologies. I
| was confused about bugs. Fixing the flat profiles will be problem
| either. The bug is that 2.0.50 will die if two profiles in a cascade
| define the
On Thursday 14 April 2005 23:26, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 April 2005 20:48, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Anyway, any objections against moving the current USE_EXPAND out of
> > make.globals and into base's make.defaults? Those using <=2.0.50* won't
> > get any additions (how it is now anywa
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 20:48, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Anyway, any objections against moving the current USE_EXPAND out of
> make.globals and into base's make.defaults? Those using <=2.0.50* won't get
> any additions (how it is now anyway) and anybody using a stacked profile
> (which requires >=2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 13, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 20:48 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Anyway, any objections against moving the current USE_EXPAND out of
make.globals and into base's make.defaults? Those using <=2.0.50*
won't get
a
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 20:48 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Anyway, any objections against moving the current USE_EXPAND out of
> make.globals and into base's make.defaults? Those using <=2.0.50* won't get
> any additions (how it is now anyway) and anybody using a stacked profile
> (which requires
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Anyway, any objections against moving the current USE_EXPAND out of
> make.globals and into base's make.defaults? Those using <=2.0.50* won't get
> any additions (how it is now anyway) and anybody using a stacked profile
> (whi
Add FEATURES, ARCH, USERLAND to USE_EXPAND
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82513
FRITZCAPI_CARDS in USE_EXPAND is needed for newer fritzcapi versions
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84422
There's bound to be more of these come up, but unlikely to be many more
versions in the porta
10 matches
Mail list logo
