On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> We have a git repo now. We can generate one at any time. We still
> don't have infra tools.
>
> I don't know if the repo is published anywhere, but there are plenty
> of bundles on dev.gentoo.org:/space/git-work/
So, if anybody does want t
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333701:
>> What comment #2 should have said: "This bug is so low priority to the
>> overall initiative that there shouldn't be anyone considering it a
>> blocker, show me the git repo then we can talk" :)
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
> 11.06.2014 04:48, Duy Nguyen пишет:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>> Another part: Git wasn't ready.
>>> The first migration attempt failed after consuming nearly 100GB of RAM!
>>> When it did work it took obscene
On 10/06/14 06:59 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> [snip]
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531
> The current state is almost usable, but it is still obscenely slow
> (e.g. initial clone taking ~10 CPU-minutes just to figure out what to
> do), but we can just throw more hardware at it.
https:
11.06.2014 04:48, Duy Nguyen пишет:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> Another part: Git wasn't ready.
>> The first migration attempt failed after consuming nearly 100GB of RAM!
>> When it did work it took obscene amounts of time, and the result was
>> unusably large (e.g.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> Since v1.9.0 we can clone from a shallow repository.
Wow, awesome! Thank you, git developers, you rock (and sorry I'm too
lazy to tell you in your own mailing list :) )!
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Another part: Git wasn't ready.
> The first migration attempt failed after consuming nearly 100GB of RAM!
> When it did work it took obscene amounts of time, and the result was
> unusably large (e.g. initial checkout would take 16GB RAM on th
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> The first migration attempt failed after consuming nearly 100GB of RAM!
> When it did work it took obscene amounts of time, and the result was
> unusably large (e.g. initial checkout would take 16GB RAM on the server,
> thus not allowing a fe
On 06/10/2014 11:45 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
[lots of whining removed ;) ]
>
> I don't know why CVS is still used for Gentoo main repository,
> probably some infrastructure elements depends deeply on its
> internals, because I see of no other reason why Git is still not
> used despite efforts o
