On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>>
>> Mostly, because when I see "A version is bumped" I immediately expect
>> to know which version the bump is to, but have to dig out the diff to
>> find out.
>>
>
> So I thought we used to have scripts that would dig out this information and
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 12 August 2015 at 02:28, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > Stuff like 'cat/pn: version bumps', 'cat/pn: new features', 'cat/pn:
> > adjusted dependencies' are generic (and short) enough yet descriptive
> > enough to see what went on while scann
On 12 August 2015 at 02:28, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Stuff like 'cat/pn: version bumps', 'cat/pn: new features', 'cat/pn:
> adjusted dependencies' are generic (and short) enough yet descriptive
> enough to see what went on while scanning the log.
I personally find those summaries a bit too terse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/08/15 04:57 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> The more we stuff into the summary line, the harder it will be to
> write meaningful summaries. And thus, people will write crappy ones
> or ignore the length limit. I recommend against any more
> pre
